ஆசிரியர் தகுதித்தேர்வு தாள் 2 காலதாமதமாக தாக்கல் செய்யப்பட்ட வழக்கு தள்ளுபடி நீதியரசர் நாகமுத்து அவர்கள் தீர்ப்பு:
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 20.03.2014
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.NAGAMUTHU
W.P.No.2411 of 2014
and M.P.No.1 of 2014
D.Priya
... Petitioner
-Versus-
The Chairman,
Teachers Recruitment Board,
EVK Sampath Maaligai,
College Road, Chennai 60006.
... Respondent
Petition filed under Article 226 of the
Constitution of India praying to issue a writ of mandamus directing the
respondent to consider the representation of the petitioner dated
13.11.2013 and declare the correct answers in respect of Paper II 'A'
Series key answers for questions Nos.8, 11, 24, 29 and Question No.61
Part III, 84 in the Teachers Eligibility Test conducted on 18.08.2013
and award three marks to the petitioner in respect of the said questions
and appoint the petitioner as B.T. Assistant pursuant to the said
examination.
For Petitioner : Mrs.A.L.Ganthimathi
For Respondent : Mr.D.Krishnakumar,
Spl. Govt. Pleader
ORDER
The petitioner participated in the Tamil Nadu
Teacher Eligibility Test (TNTET-II) held on 18.08.2013. The tentative
key answers were published calling for objection, if any. Based on the
objections and based on the opinion of the experts, final key answers
were published and the results were also published after a due
valuation. Several writ petitions were filed challenging the key answers
to a number of questions. All such writ petitions were considered,
while I was sitting in Madurai Bench, and final orders were passed. The
relief was given to all the candidates irrespective of fact whether the
candidate had approached the court or not. After everything was over, a
batch of writ petitions in W.P.(MD) No.19259 of 2013, etc., came to be
filed with a grievance in respect of key answers. All such writ
petitions were dismissed, by a common order dated 28.11.2013, on the
ground of laches and the Writ Appeals filed against that order were also
dismissed. Admittedly, the petitioner has come up with the present writ
petition belatedly. Thus, the petitioner is guilty of laches. Hence,
the writ petition deserves only to be dismissed.
2. In the result, the writ petition is dismissed. No costs. Consequently, connected MP is closed.
To
1.The Chairman, Teachers Recruitment Board, EVK Sampath
Maaligai, College Road, Chennai 60006.
Writ Petition
No.2411 of 2014
